Posts

Loose Ends

 

 

 

 

یہ مضمون اردو میں پڑھیں

A mug sat on my desk that I had been meaning to deal with for two days. I finally gestured at it, half-embarrassed, and said, “It’s just a cup.”

He smiled, the kind of smile that told me he had heard that exact sentence in a hundred different forms before. Because it is rarely just a cup. It is usually something quieter and more familiar than that. I’ll reply later. I’ll organize it tomorrow. I’ll clean it afterward. I’ll deal with it when I have more time. And somehow, without any single dramatic decision, life quietly fills with unfinished things.

He had a word for these things that I liked better than any other I had tried. Not errands, because an errand implies you have to leave the house, go somewhere, complete some transaction out in the world—and most of what sits unfinished around us never asks that much of us. Not trivialities either, since that word suggests they don’t matter, and the whole point was that they do. He called them loose ends: small threads left dangling, none of them dramatic on their own, each one quietly refusing to let the moment close.

He told me a very ordinary story to explain what he meant. He had walked into his room one morning and noticed a coffee cup still sitting there from the day before. After a meeting the previous afternoon, he had rushed outside and simply left it behind, forgotten in the rush of the day. The next morning, he looked at it and had the familiar thought everyone has in that moment: I’ll do it later. But then another thought appeared right behind the first one. How long would this actually take? A minute? Two minutes, perhaps, or even less? So he picked it up, carried it to the kitchen, rinsed it, and came back to his room. Simple. Almost insignificant. And yet he used that tiny, unremarkable moment to explain something surprisingly profound about how we live.

“We postpone many things unnecessarily,” he said.

At first, it sounded obvious, even a little too simple to be worth dwelling on. But the more I reflected on it, the more I realized how much of life quietly collapses under the weight of small delays. Not dramatic failures. Small postponements, one after another. One unread email becomes twenty. One unwashed cup becomes a cluttered room. One delayed conversation becomes emotional distance. One postponed task becomes chronic stress. And strangely, the task itself is often not the heaviest part of the burden. The mental weight of carrying it around is.

That was the first thing I began noticing after our conversation. Unfinished things occupy psychological space in a way that has nothing to do with their actual size. Even when we are not consciously thinking about them, they sit quietly in the background of our minds, a kind of invisible noise we have simply learned to live with.

He explained that many small tasks should simply be done immediately, not because they are morally profound in themselves, but because delaying them often costs more mental energy than completing them ever would. That sentence changed how I saw procrastination entirely. Because procrastination, I realized, is not really about time. It is about emotional friction, about the small resistance we feel toward a task and the relief we imagine we’ll get from avoiding it.

I decided to test this idea myself. One afternoon, I noticed several tiny tasks accumulating around me almost without my noticing. A message I needed to send, a document to file, a shirt lying on a chair, a book left open on the table. Individually, none of them mattered much at all. But together, they created a strange feeling of heaviness in the room, even though the room itself wasn’t particularly chaotic. My mind was simply slightly unsettled, the way a low hum in the background can unsettle you without you quite knowing why.

So, I tried something different. Instead of planning when I would deal with them later, I simply handled them immediately, one by one–a minute here, thirty seconds there. Within ten minutes, everything was clear. What surprised me wasn’t the physical result, which was modest enough. It was the emotional effect. I felt lighter, in a way that seemed disproportionate to what I had actually done.

That is when I understood what he was really pointing toward. Small acts of order create psychological clarity that has little to do with the task’s size. We often imagine discipline as something dramatic: waking up at four in the morning, following perfect routines, maintaining extraordinary productivity day after day. But many times, discipline begins somewhere far less glamorous than that. It begins with the cup. With the message. With the small unfinished thing sitting right in front of you, waiting.

He explained that postponement easily becomes a habit, and habits rarely stay confined to one area of life. A person who regularly delays small things slowly trains their own mind toward avoidance. The brain begins associating discomfort–even the tiniest, most trivial discomfort–with the act of postponing, and eventually that pattern spreads into larger responsibilities as well.

I remembered something from my own student years as he said this. Whenever I delayed organizing my study materials, the actual studying became emotionally harder, and not because the subject itself was difficult or impossible. It was because disorder creates its own resistance. The mind quietly feels overwhelmed by accumulation, even accumulation that has nothing directly to do with the task at hand, and once that overwhelm begins, avoidance follows naturally behind it. That is why small unfinished things matter more than they appear to on the surface. Not because the objects themselves are important, but because the patterns they create are.

He wasn’t advocating for obsessive perfectionism, and that distinction mattered to him. This was not about becoming rigid or neurotic over every tiny detail of life. It was about reducing unnecessary delay wherever immediate action is genuinely possible. He suggested there is something psychologically powerful in simply telling yourself: if this takes one minute, I will do it now. That principle interrupts procrastination before it can expand into something larger.

I began applying it in surprisingly small ways: putting things back immediately, answering simple messages without unnecessary delay, washing dishes right after using them, filing papers before they had the chance to pile up. Tiny actions, each one almost too small to notice on its own. But together they changed the emotional atmosphere of my days in a way I hadn’t expected.

I noticed something else too. Immediate action creates its own momentum. Once the mind begins moving, larger tasks start to feel easier, almost as if they are being carried along by the same motion. But delay creates stagnation instead, and stagnation has a way of spreading quietly into everything around it.

Postponement also offers a hidden emotional comfort worth naming honestly. When we delay something, we temporarily escape the discomfort of doing it, and that escape can feel like real relief in the moment. But that relief is deceptive, because the task does not actually disappear. It remains psychologically present, waiting for us, and we end up paying for that borrowed comfort later, usually with interest.

He had pointed to this gently, without ever reaching for complicated language. Sometimes, what exhausts us is not the work itself. It is the constant mental negotiation that surrounds unfinished work–the small argument we have with ourselves every time we walk past the thing we haven’t done yet.

I once met someone who described feeling perpetually overwhelmed, as though their life were simply too much to manage. But when we looked closely together, many of the stressful things in their life turned out to be small, unresolved tasks that had quietly accumulated over time: bills left unattended, emails unanswered, conversations postponed, objects left unfinished around the house. Nothing catastrophic on its own. But together, these small things created a kind of continuous cognitive pressure that felt, from the inside, indistinguishable from a much larger crisis.

That is when I realized something important. Peace is often built through small completions rather than through dramatic transformations. Not through a single sweeping change to how we live, but through the quiet accumulation of small things finished rather than left hanging.

This also has a spiritual dimension, one that felt important even though he never made it sound heavy-handed. Attentiveness matters. Care matters, even when it is directed at something as small as a cup or a message. The way a person handles their small responsibilities shapes the inner self in ways that are easy to overlook. Someone who consistently honors small responsibilities is quietly training reliability, presence, discipline, and a kind of respect for reality itself–for the fact that things are actually there, actually waiting, actually asking to be dealt with. And perhaps that is why seemingly insignificant actions can shape character far more than we tend to realize. A life rarely falls apart all at once. It slowly drifts through repeated postponements, each one small enough to seem harmless. And it slowly regains its order the same way, through repeated small acts of responsibility that seem almost too modest to matter.

Now, whenever I catch myself thinking I’ll do it later, I pause and ask a different question instead: how long would this actually take right now? And surprisingly often, the honest answer is less than a minute. So, I do it. Not because the task itself is monumental, but because I no longer want my life to be quietly governed by avoidable delay.

Because sometimes the heaviest burdens in life are not the big problems we can point to and name. They are the hundreds of loose ends we keep carrying from one moment into the next, each one small enough to ignore, all of them together heavy enough to notice.

Read the First Part 

Read the Previous Part

He was quiet for a while. Probably, he was anticipating a question or a comment from me. But my total surprise at what he had said did not even allow me to open my mouth. I was still trying to digest what he had said, when I heard him continue, “Before moving on to any further steps to take with regard promoting such moral principles – as altruism – I would like to stress the importance of two concepts: one relates to our motive for striving for any change in our current habits; while the other relates to our ability to imagine what currently does not exist. Both of these can play a vital – sometimes decisive – role in our success in bringing about any change in our attitudes and behaviors.”

“But I find these to be two completely unrelated concepts,” I said. He looked at me very seriously and said, “Our motive gives an answer to the ‘why’ for any efforts that we expend in this regard; and our imagination gives an answer to the ‘how’ and the ‘what’ for our efforts.”

I said, “I am listening,” prompting him to continue. “You see, it requires some serious effort to change an old habit. Most of the time we may find ourselves continue doing what we are used to doing even though we had decided to change it, only because of our deep-rooted habits or mental patterns. Our brain has a strong tendency to stick to old habits, as it finds it safer and more secure sticking to the already trodden paths. To get our brain to hold back from this tendency so that we can take a different course of action, which is in consonance with our decision to change, and then persisting in this effort requires us to have a strong motive, which we personally hold dear. Without such a motive, we are not even likely to consider expending any effort in this regard. “There are two aspects of having a clear motive that we must be consciously aware of: One, the motive should be intrinsic, rather than extrinsic. This means that we should not undertake such a moral act for any appreciation, recognition, or reward. “Another important, though related, aspect is that it has to be a value- or principle-based motive, not a drive-based one…” This time, I could not resist interrupting and said, “What kind of a distinction is that?”

His gaze shifted to the bookshelf standing behind me as if he was searching for a book. Then he said, “Can you hand me that book titled “Culture Against Man” by Jules Henry. It is on the second shelf at the right.” It was an old, blue-colored, paper-back edition. I took it out and handed it to him. Taking the book from my hand, he started scanning it. Then, finding what he was searching for, he looked at me and said, “Listen carefully to this,” as he started reading out from the book:

“Ours is a driven culture [the author is writing about the United States, but the similarities, in the stated regard, are obvious]. It is driven on by its achievement, competitive, profit, and mobility drives, and by the drive for security and a higher standard of living. Above all it is driven by expansiveness. Drives like hunger, thirst, sex, and rest arise directly out of the chemistry of the body, whereas expansiveness, competitiveness, achievement, and so on are generated by the culture; still we yield to the latter as we do to hunger and sex. Side-by-side with these drives is another group of urges, such as gentleness, kindliness, and generosity, which I shall call values, and in our culture a central issue for the emotional life of everyone is the interplay between these two. Values and drives – other than physiological drives – are both creations of the culture, but in the lives of Americans, and indeed of all western men and women, they play very different roles. A value is something we consider good; something we always want our wives, husbands, parents, and children to express to us, to shower on us when we are gay, to tender to us when we are miserable. Love, kindness, quietness contentment, fun, frankness, Honesty, decency, relaxation, simplicity belong here. “Fundamentally, values are different from what I call drives, and it is only a semantic characteristic of our language that keeps the two sets of feelings together. To call both competitiveness and gentleness values is as confusing as to call them both drives. Drive is what urges us blindly into getting bigger, into getting further into outer space and into destructive competition; values are the sentiments that work in the opposite direction. Drive belong to the occupational world; values to the world of the family and friendly intimacy. Drives animate the hurly-burly of business, the Armed Forces, and all those parts of our culture where getting ahead, rising in the social scale, outstripping others, and nearly surviving in the struggle are the absorbing functions of life. When values appear in those areas, they act largely as brakes on driveness. Though the occupational world is, on the whole, antagonistic to values in this sense, it would nevertheless be unable to function without them, and it may use them as veils to conceal its underlying motivations.” (Culture against Man, Jules Henry)

Then placing the book on the table by his side, he looked at me and asked, “Do you understand the difference?”

“I think so,” I said. “I gather, according to this author, honesty, compassion, empathy, etc. belong to what you have termed as ‘value- or principle-based motives,’ while more growth, increasing profits, beating the competition, etc. are what you call ‘drive-based motives.’ Is that right?”

“Yes. That is how I see it. But, there’s another very important aspect that he has highlighted in the statement: ‘When values appear in those areas, they act largely act as brakes on driveness,’ and that is the reason why it is so important in my view to not only be fully aware of the reason for our adherence to such values but also to be fully committed to them, even if we, as individuals have to sacrifice a personal gain – a drive-based motive – along the way.”

“So, what do you think should be one’s motive to strive for changing one’s habits?” I asked. “I think that question has to be answered individually by everyone who commits to traveling this road.” He said. His answers such as this one always irritated me. “Give me a hint, at least,” I said. “Ok.” He said, smiling. “Just pick that small frame from the table by your side and read it out.”

“It is something Mother Teresa has said,” I said and started reading out,

 

People are often unreasonable and self-centered. Forgive them anyway. If you are kind, people may accuse you of ulterior motives. Be kind anyway. If you are honest, people may cheat you. Be honest anyway. If you find happiness, people may be jealous. Be happy anyway. The good you do today may be forgotten tomorrow. Do good anyway. Give the world the best you have and it may never be enough. Give your best anyway. For you see, in the end, it is between you and God. It was never between you and them anyway.”

 

 

March 04, 2020
Lahore, Pakistan

Go to Next Part