Posts

The Boundary of Responsibility

The Boundary of Responsibility

 

 

 

 

یہ مضمون اردو میں پڑھیں

The conversation stayed with me long after we had parted. I understood, at least in principle, that my role was to influence rather than to control. There was relief in that realization. Yet another question kept returning to my mind. If I am not responsible for changing another person, then what am I responsible for? The next time we met, I asked him exactly that. “If their decisions are ultimately theirs,” I said, “then where does my responsibility end?”

He did not answer immediately. Instead, he asked, “When you speak to someone you care about, what do you believe your duty is?”

I began listing the obvious things. “To be honest.”

He nodded.

“To be kind.”

Another nod.

“To explain clearly.”

“Good.”

“To remain patient.”

Again he nodded. As I continued thinking, I realized something. Everything I had mentioned described my own actions. None of them described the other person’s response.

He seemed pleased that I had noticed. “Your responsibility,” he said quietly, “always lies within your own conduct.”

The simplicity of the statement concealed how easily I had forgotten it. “So whether they listen…”

“…is not yours.”

“Whether they agree…”

“…is not yours.”

“Whether they change…”

He smiled and said, “…is certainly not yours.”

I sat quietly, allowing the thought to settle. For years I had allowed my sense of responsibility to expand far beyond my own actions. Every time someone ignored good advice, I instinctively felt I had not explained it well enough. Every time they repeated the same mistake, I assumed I needed to become more persuasive. It never occurred to me that I had crossed a boundary.

He drew an imaginary line on the table with his finger. “On this side,” he said, “is everything entrusted to you.”

I waited.

“Your intention. Your sincerity. Your wisdom. Your words. Your patience. Your character.”

Then he moved his finger to the other side. “And here…,” He paused for a moment, and then added, “…begins another person’s freedom.”

The image stayed with me. It was such a simple boundary, yet I had crossed it countless times without realizing it.

He then shared something personal. “There was a time,” he said, “when I lost my temper with a close friend.”

That surprised me.

“I had spoken to him several times about a decision that was harming him. I explained my concerns carefully. I listened to his perspective. I prayed for him. Yet nothing changed.”

“What happened?”

“One day he repeated the same mistake, and I became angry.” He looked down for a moment before continuing. “I wasn’t angry because he had made another mistake.” He paused, and then said, “I was angry because I had quietly begun expecting that my words should produce change.”

I recognized the feeling immediately. Not the situation. The expectation. How many times had I done the same thing? I had mistaken sincere effort for guaranteed results. He looked at me and said something I have remembered ever since: “Your responsibility does not grow simply because another person’s resistance grows.”

That sentence exposed a habit I had never questioned. Whenever someone failed to respond, I assumed I had to do more. Explain again. Persuade again. Push a little harder. As though another person’s reluctance automatically increased my obligation.

But it doesn’t. My responsibility remains what it always was: to act with sincerity, wisdom and respect. Nothing less. But also nothing more.

“But isn’t that difficult?” I asked. “How do you care deeply without feeling responsible for the outcome?”

He smiled. “You keep caring.” I waited. I knew something more was coming. Then, he said, “You simply stop carrying what was never yours.”

There was an extraordinary freedom in that distinction. He wasn’t asking me to become detached. He wasn’t telling me to stop advising, encouraging, or supporting. He was asking me to stop measuring my faithfulness by another person’s response.

As I reflected on countless conversations from my own life, I realized how often I had evaluated myself by outcomes I could never control. If they listened, I felt successful. If they ignored me, I felt defeated. Both judgments rested on the same mistake. I had allowed someone else’s choices to become the measure of my own responsibility. Now the boundary seemed much clearer. My task is to speak truthfully. To listen carefully. To choose my words wisely. To remain respectful. To be patient. To pray. Beyond that, another person’s journey belongs to them.

As we finished our conversation, he left me with one final thought: “The clearer this boundary becomes,” he said, “the more peacefully you will be able to love people.”

I didn’t fully understand the sentence then. But I knew another question had begun to form. If my responsibility ends with sincere effort…

What happens when that effort seems to accomplish nothing?

/1 Comment/by

Your Role Is Influence, Not Control

Your Role Is Influence, Not Control

 

 

 

یہ مضمون اردو میں پڑھیں

I said it with a mixture of frustration and disappointment. “I’ve explained this so many times,” I told him. “I’ve tried different approaches. I’ve been patient. I’ve been firm. I’ve reasoned with them. I’ve reminded them. But nothing changes.”

He listened without interrupting.

“I honestly don’t know what else I’m supposed to do,” I said, after waiting for almost a minute.

He remained silent for a moment. It was as though he wanted the question to settle before responding. Then he asked quietly, “What is it that you’re trying to achieve?”

The question seemed too obvious. “I want them to change,” I replied.

He nodded, but instead of responding, he asked another question. “And do you think that is your responsibility?”

I looked at him, slightly puzzled. “What do you mean? If I care about someone, of course I want them to change.”

“I didn’t ask what you wanted,” he said gently. “I asked whether it is your responsibility.”

I wasn’t sure how to answer. Until that moment, I had never separated the two. Caring for someone and wanting them to change had always seemed inseparable. If someone I loved was making poor decisions, wasn’t it natural to feel responsible for helping them become different?

Perhaps he sensed my confusion. “Tell me,” he said, “have you ever changed simply because someone else wanted you to?”

I smiled sheepishly and said, “No.”

“What made you change?” He asked.

I thought for a while. “Usually…” I said slowly, “I changed when I became convinced that I needed to.”

He nodded again. “So the real decision was yours.”

“Yes.”

“And yet,” he continued, “you expect other people to change merely because you have explained something well.”

I laughed quietly. When he put it that way, it sounded surprisingly unreasonable.

He wasn’t suggesting that explanations don’t matter. Of course they do. Advice can illuminate something we have failed to notice. A sincere conversation can open a door that had remained closed. Sometimes another person’s words become the beginning of a profound change. But none of those things actually cause the change. At best, they invite it. That distinction had never been clear to me before.

He seemed to notice the thought forming in my mind. “You can present an idea,” he said. “You can explain it patiently. You can answer questions. You can even become an example of what you are trying to teach. But you cannot decide on another person’s behalf.”

For a while neither of us spoke. As I reflected on his words, something uncomfortable began to surface. The truth was that I wasn’t merely trying to help. I was trying to make sure they changed. Until that moment, I had never admitted that to myself. I had described my efforts as concern, sincerity, or care. And all of those were genuine. But hidden beneath them was another expectation, one I had never questioned. If I explained things clearly enough… If I found the right words… If I remained patient long enough… Surely they would change.

Looking back, I realized that most of my frustration had not come from their behavior. It had come from the gap between my expectation and reality.

He offered an example. “Imagine a father whose son is making poor choices. The father stays awake at night thinking, ‘Perhaps I haven’t explained it well enough. Maybe I need to speak more firmly. Maybe I need one more conversation.'” He paused for a while and then said, “Do you think the father’s desire is wrong?”

“No,” I replied immediately.

“Neither do I,” he said. “His love is real. His concern is real. But if he begins to believe that his son’s transformation depends entirely upon him, love quietly turns into something else.”

“Control?” I offered.

He smiled and said, “Yes.”

The word lingered in my mind. Control rarely announces itself. It often disguises itself as concern. We convince ourselves that we are simply trying to help, while quietly expecting another person to become who we think they should be. When they don’t, disappointment slowly becomes frustration, frustration becomes pressure, and pressure begins to damage the very relationship we were trying to protect.

I sat there thinking about conversations I had repeated over and over again. Each time, I believed I was offering guidance. But each unsuccessful attempt felt strangely personal, as though their decision reflected my own failure. Now I was beginning to understand why.

I had unconsciously taken responsibility for something that had never belonged to me.

He broke the silence. “You can influence people,” he said. “Sometimes deeply. Sometimes for a lifetime. But influence and control are not the same thing.”

I repeated the sentence quietly to myself. Influence… Not control. For the first time, I realized that I had spent years confusing the two. Perhaps that is why I had become so exhausted. Trying to influence someone requires sincerity, wisdom, and patience. Trying to control them requires carrying a burden no human being was ever meant to carry.

As we stood to leave, he said one final thing. “The moment you believe that another person’s change is your responsibility, you begin carrying a weight that does not belong to you.”

I walked away thinking about that. Maybe the deepest form of care is not found in trying to control another person’s journey, but in faithfully offering what we can, while respecting that the journey itself is still theirs.

Until that day, I had believed that caring meant making sure people changed. Now I was beginning to see that caring and controlling are not the same thing.

And perhaps wisdom begins when we finally learn the difference.

/1 Comment/by

Rewards Corrupt Motivation

Rewards Corrupt Motivation

 

 

یہ مضمون اردو میں پڑھیں

Intrinsic motivation is when we act simply because we value or enjoy the activity itself—like reading for love of books, painting for joy, or praying out of devotion. Extrinsic motivation is when we act for external outcomes—money, grades, applause, or fear of punishment.

Examples:

  • A flute player initially plays out of love for music. When people applaud, it adds a layer of extrinsic motivation. When money is added, the act becomes even more externalized. But when external agents set conditions—“Play every day from 9 to 12 for this payment”—the joy fades, and the activity becomes mere labor.
  • A hobbyist painter may lose passion if every painting is tied to payment. The art becomes about the reward, not the love of painting.

Research and experience both show that conditional rewards undermine intrinsic motivation. Once people begin working for the external benefit, they often start cutting corners, taking shortcuts, and losing genuine interest.

Extrinsic Motivation Eats Away at Intrinsic Motivation

Rewards are extrinsic motivators — they come from outside the individual. While they can temporarily influence behavior, they often undermine the very intrinsic motivation that sustains genuine interest, creativity, and growth.

When a person is intrinsically motivated, they act out of interest, curiosity, enjoyment, or sense of purpose. For example, a child might read a storybook because they love the adventure, or practice drawing because it makes them happy.

But once rewards enter the scene — “Read for 30 minutes and I’ll give you ice cream” — the focus shifts from the joy of the process to the expectation of the outcome. Reading is no longer about adventure; it is about dessert.

Example: Students who once loved math puzzles lose their natural enthusiasm when every assignment is graded and ranked. The joy of solving is replaced by the anxiety of marks.

Over time, the activity itself becomes devalued: “If I’m not getting anything for it, why should I bother?”

This phenomenon is well-documented in Ryan & Deci’s research: extrinsic motivators tend to crowd out intrinsic ones.

 

They Shift Focus from Process to Outcome

Intrinsic motivation thrives on process-oriented activities — learning, self-improvement, artistic expression, healthy living, prayer, or fitness. The reward lies in doing them, not just in achieving something at the end.

Extrinsic motivators flip this dynamic: the process becomes a burden, tolerated only for the sake of the prize or fear of the penalty.

Example: A person may start exercising for the joy of feeling energetic and strong. But if they begin chasing external praise (“You’ve lost weight!”) or social approval, the internal satisfaction diminishes. Miss the praise, and motivation collapses.

This makes extrinsic motivators especially counterproductive in fields that demand patience, persistence, and love for the process — like science, writing, spiritual growth, or personal development.

 

They Hinder Passion and Creativity

Passion is sustained when people feel free to explore, experiment, and immerse themselves without fear of judgment or external pressure. Rewards and punishments create narrow goals: “Do this to get that.”

Example: An artist painting for joy explores styles, colors, and techniques freely. But when painting becomes about selling or winning competitions, their creativity may shrink to what pleases judges or buyers.

Similarly, children praised only for high grades may avoid challenging subjects where they might fail, stunting their curiosity.

In this way, extrinsic motivation limits exploration and replaces passion with compliance.

 

They Create Dependence on External Validation

When people rely on extrinsic motivators, they begin to crave external approval, rewards, or recognition in order to act. This fosters dependency rather than autonomy.

Example: A student who only studies when praised becomes incapable of studying independently.

Adults may similarly fall into cycles of praise addiction at work, where performance is tied to recognition rather than inner commitment.

This dependency erodes integrity: actions are guided not by what is right or meaningful but by what will gain approval.

 

They Trigger Anxiety and Fear of Failure

With extrinsic motivators, the flip side of “reward” is always “punishment.” When outcomes matter more than process, fear of failure looms large.

Example: If a child is rewarded for every success, failure feels catastrophic — not only is there no reward, but there may be shame.

Over time, such children may avoid risks, challenges, or difficult subjects altogether because the cost of failing seems too high.

Thus, extrinsic motivation promotes risk-aversion, the opposite of the resilience needed for growth.

 

They Undermine Long-Term Persistence

Extrinsic motivation is inherently short-lived. Once the carrot or stick disappears, so does the behavior.

Example: An employee who works hard only for a bonus may slack off once the bonus is removed.

A child who reads for stickers stops reading once the chart is full.

Intrinsic motivation, by contrast, builds habits and persistence — because the reward is internal.

 

They Can Distort Moral Outlook

When people act primarily for external rewards, the moral meaning of their choices is lost.

Example: A child may refrain from lying because “Dad will punish me” rather than because “truth matters.”

As adults, such individuals often ask, “What will I get if I do this?” instead of “What is the right thing to do?”

This transactional mindset corrodes integrity and weakens the foundation for authentic moral responsibility.

 

They Fail to Build Internal Constructions

For a reward or punishment to “work,” it must feel more valuable (or painful) to the person than the act itself. This fragile equation means the motivator must constantly escalate — a larger prize, a harsher penalty — to remain effective.

But this misses the deeper goal: to shape the inner meaning of actions. We want people to value honesty, justice, or compassion for their own sake.

Example: If a child tells the truth only to earn candy, they will likely abandon honesty once the candy loses its charm. True integrity comes when truthfulness is seen as inherently right — even if it costs one approval or comfort.

Failing to nurture such internal constructions does more than weaken motivation; it corrodes character. People learn to calculate payoffs instead of cultivating principle-centered living.

 

Conclusion: Why Avoid Extrinsic Motivation

Extrinsic motivators appear effective because they bring quick results. However beneath the surface, they are counterproductive: they erode intrinsic motivation, shift focus from process to outcome, stifle passion, foster dependency, trigger fear of failure, and erode moral integrity.

For all pursuits that require depth, patience, and sincerity — learning, creativity, health, spirituality, and relationships — extrinsic motivators are not just insufficient, they are obstacles.

The alternative is to nurture intrinsic motivation: the joy of learning for its own sake, the satisfaction of doing right, the pride of effort, and the sense of meaning that sustains us even when no one is watching.

/1 Comment/by