Posts

The Space Where Accountability Lives

The Space Where Accountability Lives

 

 

یہ مضمون اردو میں پڑھیں

I sat across from him and finally said what had been on my mind for days: “I don’t understand why I’m held responsible for anything. Isn’t everything determined? My upbringing, my temperament, my reactions—they all come from conditioning. So what part is really my choice?”

He looked at me calmly, as if he had heard this struggle many times before. “You really feel that nothing you do is a choice?” he asked.

“Well,” I said, “I was born into a certain environment, shaped by certain experiences, programmed with certain triggers. So, if I act a certain way, especially in emotionally charged moments, why blame me? Isn’t it all predetermined?”

He let a thoughtful silence settle between us. Then he asked, “If that is completely true, then why praise someone for being kind, or discourage someone from being cruel? Why reward good behavior or punish harmful behavior? If people are only acting out their conditioning, then moral language becomes pointless.”

I felt a slight discomfort. “When you put it that way… it does sound extreme.”

“That’s because it is extreme,” he replied. “Many things about you were indeed predetermined. You didn’t choose your parents, your childhood, your genetics, the emotional vocabulary you were given, or your natural tendencies. But there is one thing that was not predetermined.”

I leaned forward. “What’s that?”

He said, “How you respond in any given situation. That part is not written. That part is yours.”

I frowned. “I don’t know. Some reactions feel uncontrollable.”

“Like what?” he asked.

“For example,” I said, “when someone insults me. I just can’t control my anger. It explodes. In that moment, I honestly feel like I have no choice.”

He tilted his head. “No choice at all? None?”

“Yes,” I insisted. “Whatever I do in that anger feels automatic—beyond my control.”

He smiled—not dismissively, but knowingly. “All right. Let me ask you something. What if the perceived insult came from your teacher?”

I blinked.

“What if it came from your boss?” he continued.

I felt myself getting quieter.

“And what if,” he asked finally, “it came from a parent?”

I looked down, because the truth was now painfully apparent. My “uncontrollable anger” seemed very controllable in certain situations.

He didn’t rush me. He let me arrive at the realization on my own.

After a moment, I whispered, “That… would be different.”

“Why different?” he asked gently. “The insult is the same. The words are the same. The hurt is the same. So why does your reaction change?”

I sighed. “Because the consequences matter more. I’d stop myself.”

He nodded. “Exactly. So, the reaction is controllable. You simply choose not to control it in some situations. When the stakes are high, you regulate yourself. That regulation is willpower. Your understanding of what is appropriate—that comes from conscience. Both operate inside you. You are just not using them consistently.”

His words settled into me more deeply than I expected. “So, I do have a choice… even when it doesn’t feel like it.”

He said, “You always have a choice. Sometimes the space is small—a single breath—but it exists. Between the stimulus and the reaction lies a gap. In that gap is your willpower. In that gap whispers your conscience. That is the part of you that makes you human.”

I watched him for a moment as he continued. “Let me tell you something. A few days ago, someone cut me off in traffic. My irritation rose instantly—my conditioning ready to react. But then I remembered how I want my child to handle such moments. A small space opened. I used it. I didn’t honk. I didn’t glare. I let it pass. A small choice on the outside, but a meaningful one on the inside.”

I nodded slowly. “So, accountability is not about my past, but about that small moment of choosing.”

He said, “Exactly. You are not answerable for your genetics, your upbringing, or your emotional wiring. You are answerable for your response—the place where willpower and conscience meet. That is the part no one else can control. That is the part that defines you.”

I exhaled, feeling a strange mixture of relief and responsibility. “Believing everything was determined made me feel safe at first… but also powerless.”

He smiled gently. “That’s because it takes away the only part of you that truly matters. Determinism explains your starting point. Responsibility determines your destination. You cannot control the storms of life, but you can choose how you steer your boat. That small choice—that steering—is your humanity.”

I looked at him with a new clarity forming. “So, everything may be written… except my response?”

He nodded. “Yes. And that small unwritten part—your response—is why you are accountable… and why you matter.”

/0 Comments/by

The Freedom No One Can Take Away

The Freedom No One Can Take Away

 

 

یہ مضمون اردو میں پڑھیں

Viktor Frankl, the Austrian neurologist and psychiatrist who survived the horrors of Nazi concentration camps, once expressed a timeless truth: everything can be taken away from a person—health, wealth, relationships, possessions—but one freedom always remains: the freedom to choose one’s response.

This insight was not a philosophical idea formed in a comfortable armchair; it was uncovered through the toughest human experiences. Frankl spent three years in concentration camps, dealing with starvation, humiliation, forced labor, and the constant threat of death. Every morning, he woke up uncertain if he would make it through the day, and each night, he went to sleep not knowing if he would see the sunrise. Still, amidst this daily fight with mortality, he learned that even when everything was taken away, there was one thing his captors could not take—his inner freedom.

Freedom in the Midst of Suffering

Frankl noted that prisoners reacted differently to the same brutality. Some gave in to despair, others became bitter, while a few kept their dignity and compassion. The difference wasn’t in the circumstances — which were equally harsh for everyone — but in how they responded.

This is where Frankl’s discovery shines:

  • You may not control what happens to you.
  • You may not control how others treat you.
  • You may not control illness, loss, or tragedy.

But you can always control how you choose to respond.

Think about two people who unexpectedly lose their jobs.

  • The first person falls into despair, blames others, and sinks into hopelessness.
  • The second experiences the same pain but chooses to view it as a chance to re-evaluate life, improve skills, or even follow a long-neglected passion.

The event remains the same—losing a job. But the result varies greatly depending on how you respond.

Small Daily Illustrations

This principle is not limited to extreme cases like concentration camps or devastating losses. It applies to our everyday lives.

  • When someone cuts us off in traffic, do we get angry or take a deep breath and keep going?
  • When a family member speaks harshly, should we retaliate right away or pause and respond calmly?
  • When plans fall apart, do we drown in self-pity or see the setback as a lesson?

In each situation, our well-being is influenced more by how we respond than by what actually happens.

An Anecdote of Perspective

A teacher once poured a glass of water halfway and asked the class, “What do you see?” Some said, “Half empty.” Others said, “Half full.” He smiled and said, “Both are correct. But remember, the choice of which one you see determines not just your mood today but also your future tomorrow.”

Frankl’s lesson is the same: we cannot alter the facts, but we can always change how we see and respond to them.

Remember

  1. Response is Power – It is the one area of freedom no one can breach.
  2. Response is Responsibility – With this freedom comes accountability; we can’t always blame circumstances or others.
  3. Response Shapes Character – Each time we select our response, we are shaping who we become.

A Takeaway for Life

The world may take away many things from us. We might face illness, rejection, failure, or even severe injustice. But as long as we are alive, we hold within us the sacred space of choice. That space—our ability to respond—is the source of dignity, resilience, and purpose.

As Frankl understood in the bleakest moments: “They can take everything from me, but they cannot take my response. That remains mine, and mine alone.”

For Reflection:

Recall a recent situation where you reacted impulsively. If you had taken a moment to pause, what different response could you have chosen? How might it have affected the outcome for you and others?

/by

Punishment by ‘Community Service’!

I was attending a meeting with an educational group. One of the members of the group mentioned that they had found an innovative way of punishing those students, who were found guilty of misconduct. He elaborated on his excitement thus: ‘When someone is found guilty of misconduct, he/she has to perform a fixed number of hours in community service.’ I could not hold myself back from interjecting him and said: ‘Community service as a punishment? Don’t you think a person should be subjected to it as a reward for something good that he/she has done, rather than as a punishment?’ Ignoring my question, he said: ‘This point is beyond the scope of this meeting. Secondly, we have had great results from it. We will, therefore, continue doing so.’ And that was the end of the discussion on this point.

I am strictly against the idea of controlling behavior through the Skinnerian or the Behavioral model of Rewards and Punishments. Much has and will be written and said on it. Today, my surprise at this idea of subjecting a perpetrator to mandatory hours of ‘community service’ forced me to write. It needs to be acknowledged at the start that this is not a new idea and may find its roots in the idea of the rehabilitation of criminals.

Without delving into the philosophical aspects of this point of view, there is one aspect that makes one cringe: Do we want to promote ‘community work’ in our young, as a punishment? A punishment, as the current social paradigm holds, is something that a wrongdoer is subjected to, which is considered humiliating and socially degrading. The whole idea can be summed up as follows:

When I have done something wrong, I should be subjected to an act that would make me feel more humiliated and degraded, compared to the pleasure I had gained from my initial ‘wrong’ doing.

Now, think about the whole idea again. Do we want to promote community service in our young as representing humiliation and social degradation? Shouldn’t it, to the contrary, be promoted as representing a special privilege that only the fortunate ones are allowed to undertake? As already mentioned, I am strictly against the behavioral idea of behavior modification, but it was only with this in mind that I had dared to ask: Don’t you think a person should be subjected to it as a reward for something good that he/she has done, rather than as a punishment?

We are so overwhelmed by the Skinnerian school of stimulus and response that we have completely lost sight of the fact that the element of perception that lies between the stimulus and the response plays a pivotal role in the ultimate and the long-term development of the human being in question. It is quite possible to get the desired response from the subject in the short-run (because of our control over the stimulus), yet in the long-run such stimuli, because of misperceptions (or simply different perceptions) on the part of the subject, can sometimes lead to results that are very different from what we had originally desired.

 

December 18, 2019
(Lahore, Pakistan)

/by